Legal Opinion

Pechatsko v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 30, 2004No. 1:01 CV 112PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BAUGHMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Patricia Pechatsko’s motion to amend or alter judgment. 1 The defendant Commissioner of Social Security has opposed that motion. 2 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. 3

The judgment placed at issue by Péchat-sko’s motion affirmed the denial of her application for disability -insurance benefits. 4 In denying the application, the Commissioner adopted an administrative law judge’s finding that Pechatsko had a residual functional capacity that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Robert Johnson, Mark Stimpson Allen BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bollenbacher v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  2. EJS PROPERTIES, LLC v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. Lohr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  4. Briscoe v. MohrDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
  5. Evans v. Auto Club Property Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API