Pechatsko v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUGHMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Patricia Pechatsko’s motion to amend or alter judgment. 1 The defendant Commissioner of Social Security has opposed that motion. 2 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. 3
The judgment placed at issue by Péchat-sko’s motion affirmed the denial of her application for disability -insurance benefits. 4 In denying the application, the Commissioner adopted an administrative law judge’s finding that Pechatsko had a residual functional capacity that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Robert Johnson, Mark Stimpson Allen BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bollenbacher v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- EJS PROPERTIES, LLC v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Lohr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Briscoe v. MohrDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Evans v. Auto Club Property Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.