Legal Opinion

Rosero v. Blake

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 2003No. 322A02PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

The questions presented for review are whether the North Carolina common-law rule that custody of an illegitimate child presumptively vests in the mother has been abrogated by statutory and case law and whether that presumption violates the federal and state Constitutions. We conclude that the common-law rule has been abrogated by statute, and accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The parties to this action are the natural parents of Kayla Alexandria Rosero, bom 20 March 1996. Following brief sexual encounters between the parties in 1995, plaintiff,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dixon v. GordonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. David v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. In re M.I.W.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Munoz v. MunozCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API