Legal Opinion

State v. Illinois Central Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 10, 1937No. 31,216PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

Defendant's petition for rehearing is denied. But because there must be a new trial to the extent indicated in our decision, which is adhered to, it is proper that we should express ourselves on the following points raised by defendant's petition.

Again we are urged to consider the argument that defendant discharged its full liability to the state by paying the taxes as computed by the tax commission and its examiners long before this suit was brought. Without debate as to its soundness, we allow for the purposes of argument defendant's contention that its answer should be construed as having…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hanley v. NoyesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Littell v. MintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API