Legal Opinion
Daybreak, Inc. v. Friedberg
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided June 3, 2013No. Civil No. 2012-76Published
1Opinion of the Court
GÓMEZ, Chief Judge,
District Court of the Virgin Islands.
ORDER
(June 3, 2013)
Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff/counterclaim defendant Daybreak, Inc., doing business as Huber & Associates (“Daybreak”), for attorneys’ fees1 and costs.
*658I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In or about May 2010, Daybreak agreed to install copper roofing on property owned by the defendants Thomas F. Friedberg (“Friedberg”) and Sarah L. Bunge (“Bunge”). A dispute over Daybreak’s entitlement to payment ensued.
Thereafter, on December 21, 2010, Daybreak initiated this action in the Superior Court of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Lussier v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.