Legal Opinion

People v. Kresel

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

This is an application by which the defendant seeks to have the district attorney submit for his inspection a copy of the testimony of the defendant herein given on the 9th day of February, 1931, in reference to a so-called Boliver transaction, before a grand jury which, at that time, was considering a complaint on behalf of the People against one Marcus and others, which proceeding later led to an indictment in an action entitled The People of the State of New York against Marcus and others.

The defendant herein was called as a witness before such grand jury and waiving immunity (this due to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lemon v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. People v. SteinhardtNew York Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Daly v. DimockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  5. People v. RadeloffNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. United States v. John AluCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. People v. GattiNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1938
  5. In re Attorney-General of the United States, New York County Courts1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API