State ex rel. Goddard-Peck & Co. v. Rayburn
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Iron Circuit Court. — Hon. J. E. Green, ■ Judge. (1) The material facts in this case are undisputed, and it is in such cases the duty of the appellate court to review the action of the trial court and decide whether its judgment was warranted by the facts. Bruen v. Fair Ass’n, 40 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Iron Circuit Court. — Hon. J. E. Green, ■ Judge. (1) The material facts in this case are undisputed, and it is in such cases the duty of the appellate court to review the action of the trial court and decide whether its judgment was warranted by the facts. Bruen v. Fair Ass’n, 40 Mo. App. 425; Waddell v. Williams, 50 Mo. 216; Moore v, Hutchinson, 69 Mo. 429. The judgment of the court is so opposed to all reasonable probabilities, that it must be the result of mistake, bias or' prejudice. Gcwrett v. Oreenwell, 92 Mo. 120-125; Wliitsett v. Rmsom, 79 Mo. 258; Spohn v. Railroad,…
1Opinion of the CourtRombaueb, P. J.
— On the twenty-second day of August, 1881, appellants, 'J. W. Goddard et al., brought suit by attachment in the circuit court of Dunklin county against S. W. Spiller et al., doing-business under the name of Spiller, Haynes & McRee. The writ was placed in the hands of respondent, Moore M. Rayburn, then sheriff, who attached certain books of account as the property of defendants, but after-wards released them. At the November term, 1881, the venue was changed to Stoddard county, and at the March term, 1882, of the circuit court of that county, plaintiffs obtained judgment sustaining their…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lindley v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- State ex rel. Goddard, Peck & Co. v. RayburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
- State ex rel. Beckwith v. FinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- State ex rel. Goddard, Peck & Co. v. RayburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888