Legal Opinion
Everdyke v. Esley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appeEants to abide the event. Memorandum: The court erred in not permitting proof of the conviction of the plaintiff. (Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co., 258 N. Y. 310; Matter of Rechtschaffen, 278 id. 336.) AE concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a civE action for assault. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Sims v. Union News Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Smith v. MinissaleNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Uzenski v. FitzsimmonsNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Cannon v. WeissbergNew York Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.