Corwin v. Bensley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, Alameda County. • The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Wallace, J.:
Corwin brought an action in the Bistrict Court of the Twelfth Judicial Bistrict against Bensley, Compton, Mason, and Bumartheray, in June, 1864, filing a lis penclens, and alleging himself to be the owner in fee and in possession of certain lands, consisting of several blocks, among the rest block one hundred and two, in the Potrero Huevo survey, in the City and County of San Francisco, to which lands he alleged that the defendants claimed title adversely to him, etc., and prayed that the claim of title on the part of the defendants be adjudged to be invalid, etc.
The…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Whitehurst v. AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Morris v. . BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Walker v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Amador Canal & Mining Co. v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Silvarer v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.