Smith v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
Appellant was convicted, generally, under an indictment consisting of two counts, one charging the offense of burglary, and the other grand larceny.
There was ample evidence tending to prove the corpus delicti.
Other than the evidence which we have held to be sufficient to establish the corpus delicti, the only other testimony in the case, upon which the verdict of conviction was returned, was that of a confession by appellant.
The rule as to the admission of testimony as to confessions is too well known to need repetition here. Suffice to say that it was not violated in the instant case.
Appellan…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eskridge v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Mose v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
3Cited by32 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Dennison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Callahan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Redwine v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.