Nichols v. G.D. Searle & Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER E. BLACK, Jr., Chief Judge.
Presently pending before the Court are defendant's Motions for Rule 12(d) Preliminary Hearing on its Defense of Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. Beginning in 1983, more than one hundred female plaintiffs began to file products liability claims in Maryland against G.D. Searle & Company and Searle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Searle”). Each plaintiff alleges that she was injured due to use of Searle’s Copper-7 device, a contraceptive product.
To support a finding of personal jurisdiction, plaintiffs contend that Searle, a nonresident…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Nichols v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Madison Three, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Estate of Bank v. Swiss Valley Farms, Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.