Ingram v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.
Reginald Ingram filed these pro se appeals from the denial of his “Motion for an Order Allowing the Defendant to File a Motion for New Trial and Pursue an Appeal Out-of-Time.” For the reasons that follow, we (1) vacate the trial court’s order denying Ingram’s motion for an out-of-time appeal and remand the case for a hearing consistent with this opinion; and (2) affirm the trial court’s order as to the motion for new trial.
In March 2004, after a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel, Ingram was convicted of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Hasty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Nesbitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hosea Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Labarrion Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Lorenzo Cruz-Santana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Teaunta Y. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013