Legal Opinion

Ingram v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 6, 2009No. A09A2013, A09A2014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

Reginald Ingram filed these pro se appeals from the denial of his “Motion for an Order Allowing the Defendant to File a Motion for New Trial and Pursue an Appeal Out-of-Time.” For the reasons that follow, we (1) vacate the trial court’s order denying Ingram’s motion for an out-of-time appeal and remand the case for a hearing consistent with this opinion; and (2) affirm the trial court’s order as to the motion for new trial.

In March 2004, after a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel, Ingram was convicted of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Hasty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  5. Nesbitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hosea Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Labarrion Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Lorenzo Cruz-Santana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Teaunta Y. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API