Chittenden v. Nichols
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe Comity.
1Per curiam
The sole question for decision is what effect, in an attachment proceeding- under the code, the giving by defendant of a so-called forthcoming bond has with respect to the attached property.
There-have been two trials-of the action'in the *203district court. The, first judgment, upon appeal to the court of appeals, was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. The opinion is reported in 14 Colo. Appeals, at page 49, under title Nichols v. Chittenden. Each of the three judges of that court wrote an opinion, the majority holding that where personal property is attached and afterwards released…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schneider v. WallingfordColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
- Stevenson v. PalmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Edwards v. PomeroySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- King v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Curry v. Equitable Surety Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1915
- Curry v. Equitable Surety Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1915