Canale v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Judge.
Scott Adam Canale appeals from his judgment and sentences for five armed robberies. He argues that the trial court made several errors in sentencing. We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written sentence.
The appellant was charged by five separate informations with five armed robberies. He pled guilty to all charges. The trial court departed from the recommended guidelines range of four and one-half to five and one-half years and imposed concurrent terms of ten years’ imprisonment with three years’ mandatory minimum…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Wilcox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996