Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bruington Engineering, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, L.L.C.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 27, 2014No. 04-13-00558-CVPublished

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by:

MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.

I must dissent to the decision to deny Pedernal Energy, LLC’s motion for en banc reconsideration because contrary to the holding in the panel opinion, it was within the trial court’s discretion to dismiss the complaint without prejudice based on the plain language of the statute. In other words, the plain language of section 150.002(e) does not mandate a dismissal with prejudice. The panel opinion distorts the plain meaning of section 150.002(e) in this case, stepping into the shoes of the Texas Legislature and rewriting the statute.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fleming Foods of Texas, Inc. v. RylanderTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Perkins v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Samlowski v. WootenTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund v. Del Industrial, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Villafani v. TrejoTexas Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API