Legal Opinion

Winter v. City of Geneva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting plaintiffs’ motion to file a late notice of claim. Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the failure to file timely a notice of claim. The fact that an attorney was not immediately consulted because plaintiff Karl Winter, Jr., assumed that the pain in his hands would go away is not a sufficient excuse (see, Matter of Martin v City of New York, 100 AD2d 879). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doherty v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Mark v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Ertel v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Thompson v. ChalichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API