Blankenship v. Whaley
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
Plaintiff had judgment decreeing him to have the perpetual right, jointly with defendants * Whaley (husband and wife) and others, to the use of a certain ditch on the land of defendants Whaley, for the purpose of conducting water through and in'the same for irrigating purposes, and the right at all times to enter upon said land for the purpose of doing all things necessary to the maintenance of the ditch, and granting him an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with him in the exercise of such right to the use of said ditch.
The defendants Whaley appeal from the judgment and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blankenship v. WhaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Nielson v. SandbergUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Gaddis v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Bree v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Merchants National Bank v. CarmichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.