Legal Opinion

Foutz v. Hacker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 25, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

This is an action for slander in which appellee recovered of appellant a verdict and judgment for $1,000.00.

The words alleged to have been used by appellant are: “You stole our tobacco and you know it, bless God; I said it once and I say it again. ’ ’

The defense was a general denial.

On his examination in chief appellee did not give the precise words stated in the petition. On his redirect examination the following occurred:

“Q. I want to read to you the exact words that you allege in your petition for cause of action, ‘You stole our tobacco and you…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alvey v. KernCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  2. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Wood v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API