Ewell v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco to dismiss two actions pending there, wherein the petitioner is defendant and appears as his own attorney. Motions to dismiss these actions were heard by the superior court and denied.
It appears on the face of the petition that a stipulation was entered into in each action that the cause might be dropped from the trial calendar to be set by either party upon notice, “and laches on the .part of either party in bringing said action on for trial is hereby waived.” The actions were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People ex rel. Gesford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People ex rel. Polhemus v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Meinholtz v. Henryetta Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- First National Bank of San Pedro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925