Legal Opinion

Browne v. Hagen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 17, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion ■ is reported in 90 N. J. L. 423.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Chief Justice.

This is a quo warranto proceeding brought for the purpose of determining the title to the office of .health inspector of-the city of Paterson. The relator by his information challenges the right of the respondent, Hagen, who is the incumbent, to continue in the occupation of the office, and asserts his own right to hold it. The- respondent demurred to the information, and upon the hearing before the Supreme Court judgment was directed for the relator. From that judgment the respondent appeals.

The information discloses the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larkey v. City of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  2. Mensone v. NJ Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Twp. of Woodbridge v. Civil Service CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Bodnar v. Board of HealthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  5. Allgaier v. Township of WoodbridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API