Legal Opinion

Moffett v. Berlin Water Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

One “who has granted an easement upon his own land is not bound to do more than to abstain from acts inconsistent with its proper enjoyment, unless there is a covenant, either by express terms, or by implication from the language of the grant.” Bartlett v. Peaslee, 20 N. H. 547, 549; Cole v. Company, 79 N. H. 187, 188. The plaintiff concedes the correctness of the foregoing principle when applied to the construction of the deed standing alone, but contends that it can be found from the evidence that prior to the wrong complained of, (1) the defendant had by practical construction of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cole v. Fred B. Pierce Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sinkey v. Board of County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API