Johnell Allen v. Carol Howes
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCole, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority’s disposition of Allen’s right to present a defense claim. I write separately because I disagree with the majority’s rejection of Allen’s ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim based on counsel’s failure to appeal the erroneous exclusion of evidence. Allen’s testimony clarifies that he was concerned about his seventeen-month-old twins’ safety, and the jury could have believed that this concern, not an intent to kill McMullen, motivated Allen’s actions on the day McMullen was killed. The trial court, however, improperly excluded the only evidence Allen…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- David A. Mapes, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ralph Coyle, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.