Legal Opinion

United States v. Burnett

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 16, 1979No. 79 Cr. 54PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

This is a motion by two surety companies pursuant to Rule 46(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to set aside the forfeiture of bonds posted by them to secure the appearance of the defendant, Michael Burnett, who, together with a co-defendant, was charged with a scheme and artifice to defraud by means of mail and wire communications. Burnett, who had a substantial prior criminal record, including a bail-jumping conviction, originally was held in $500,000 bail fixed by a Magistrate of this Court. Thereafter, following the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Jean NebbiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. CienaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. United States v. YimDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SabackSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  2. In Re ProcacciantiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  3. State v. WernerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. United States v. MoralesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
  5. International Fidelity Insurance v. CroslandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API