Legal Opinion

People v. Arana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 9, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Feople correctly concede that defendant is entitled to be brought before the court, provided with assigned counsel if eligible, and offered an opportunity to be heard on his motion for resentencing on his class B felony convictions. Although the sentences at issue run concurrently with the life sentences defendant is serving on his class A-l felony convictions, and this Court has upheld the denial of resentencing on those convictions (People v Arana, 45 AD3d 311 [1st Dept 2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 1031 [2008]), the statutory procedural requirements still apply (see People v Diaz, 68 AD3d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API