Legal Opinion

United States v. Lifshitz

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 23, 2013No. Docket 11-2078-crPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Brandon Michael Lifshitz appeals from the amended May 18, 2011 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Preska, C.J.) revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to a term' of 24 months’ imprisonment and 12 months’ supervised release. Lifshitz argues the district court committed error in his sentencing by im-permissibly basing the length of his sentence on his rehabilitative needs. We agree that when sentencing a defendant after revoking a term of supervised release, a district court may not sentence based on the defendant’s need for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Tapia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. James Bennett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter Henry Vandergrift, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Del Valle-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. NaramorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Terrance ShawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. Janet SchonewolfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API