Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. City of Quincy

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 5, 1964No. 20422Published

1Opinion of the CourtNash, P. J.

In this action of tort the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries which he sustained as a result of a fall alleged to have been caused by a defect in the sidewalk in front of the Shop & Save Supermarket on Independence Avenue, a public way in the City of Quincy.

It is agreed that due and proper notice was given to the City of Quincy in accordance with G. L. c. 84, §18.

There was a finding for the plaintiff in the sum of $2500.

*148The defendant claims to be aggrieved by the exclusion of evidence relating to the description of the alleged defect in the sidewalk; by the finding that the City…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Newton v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Sacchetti v. SpringerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Vellante v. Town of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Isaacson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Kelly v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API