Legal Opinion

New York City Transit Authority v. Pierrot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMikoll, J.

Proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Transportation which granted Venus Transportation a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate as a van service common carrier of passengers by motor vehicle.

Respondent George P. Pierrot is the owner of a 15-seat passenger van which he uses to transport commuters in New York City. Pierrot applied to respondent Department of Transportation (DOT) for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Howell v. BensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. New York City Transit Authority v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Toniann's Limousine Service, Ltd. v. New York State Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New York City Transit Authority v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. City of New York v. TransportAzumah LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. City of New York v. TransportAzumah LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. DiGeorgio v. SwartsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API