Legal Opinion

Hincks Coal Co. v. Milan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 23, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

In this action on the case for conspiracy, the defendants are jointly charged with defrauding the Hincks Coal Company, which is engaged in the coal and wood business in Bangor, Maine. At,the return term, a default was entered against the defendant Frank H. Toole, but his co-defendant Charles H. Milan pleaded to the issue and joined in a stipulation for hearing by the Court with jury waived. The finding there was for the plaintiff Company but only for nominal damages. Exceptions to the inadequacy of that award were sustained in the Law Court.

At the next term of the Trial Court, the action…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Staples v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  3. Davis v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Jordan v. HilbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
  5. Proprietors of the Kennebeck Purchase v. BoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cohen v. BowdoinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Merrill Trust Co. v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Doane v. Pine State Volkswagen, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  4. Wood v. BalzanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  5. Lawson v. McLeodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API