Legal Opinion

Newberry v. Hardin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 13, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Morris, Commissioner—

Affirming.

Two contiguous lots owned by contesting parties are in tbe town of Inez, each a portion of a lot theretofore owned by J. C. Newberry. It is difficult to describe them due to lack of explanation in briefs, which merely refer , us to three maps filed with the record. Lot No. 2 is owned by appellee; No. 3 by appellants. Both face Bock-Castle Creek on its west side, lot No. 3 being down the stream. The controversy is whether or not appellants, under an alleged grant and use, have the right to a way across the lot of appellee in passing to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co. v. Elkhorn City Land Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Hammonds v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Stegman v. City of Fort ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  4. Richardson v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Carrigan v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  2. Newberry v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API