Newberry v. Hardin
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Morris, Commissioner—
Affirming.
Two contiguous lots owned by contesting parties are in tbe town of Inez, each a portion of a lot theretofore owned by J. C. Newberry. It is difficult to describe them due to lack of explanation in briefs, which merely refer , us to three maps filed with the record. Lot No. 2 is owned by appellee; No. 3 by appellants. Both face Bock-Castle Creek on its west side, lot No. 3 being down the stream. The controversy is whether or not appellants, under an alleged grant and use, have the right to a way across the lot of appellee in passing to a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co. v. Elkhorn City Land Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Hammonds v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Stegman v. City of Fort ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Richardson v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Carrigan v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stewart v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Newberry v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952