Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Fillman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1987No. 74815PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Appellant Shaw entered into negotiations with appellees Fillman and Proven, Inc. to purchase the inventory and other assets of a ladies apparel store which was going out of business. Shaw knew that Fillman was acting as the seller’s broker. Nevertheless, it is undisputed that Fillman represented to Shaw that he would undertake certain duties toward her, including: (1) seeing that all information requested by her was obtained from the seller; (2) communicating offers to the seller; and (3) assuring that when the deal was closed it would be satisfactory to both parties. The seller…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cochran v. MurrahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Spratlin, Harrington & Thomas, Inc. v. HawnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Stewart v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Johnson v. Pennington Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. CM MILLER CO. INC. v. RameyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stelts v. EppersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Eagle Jets, LLC v. Atlanta Jet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Jim Royer Realty, Inc. v. MoreiraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Allen v. Remax North Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Eagle Jets LLC v. Atlanta Jet Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API