Legal Opinion

R.D. Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2005No. 98990PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The main issue presented by this appeal is whether claimant was an “employee entitled to receive disability benefits” within the meaning of section 12 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) (820 ILCS 305/12 (West 1998)), so that he was required to submit to an employer-requested medical examination to avoid suspension of benefits. We answer in the affirmative.

BACKGROUND

Claimant, Scott Hunter, filed an application for adjustment of claim to recover benefits for a back injury he allegedly sustained while working for R.D. Masonry (Masonry) on August 21, 1998. Masonry disputed the claim and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Metzger v. DaRosaIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sylvester v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Thomas v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Murray v. Chicago Youth CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. SimpsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Cassens Transport Co. v. Illinois Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Board of Education of the City of Chicago v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Interstate Scaffolding, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API