Legal Opinion

Pescetto v. Colonial Trust & Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1984No. 3—84—0337PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HEIPLE

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant Colonial Trust & Savings Bank (the bank) appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Aurelia Pescetto in the amount of $10,721.93 on count I of her complaint. The trial court certified this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (87 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)).

Aurelia Pescetto and her late husband, Battist, had a joint tenancy savings account with the bank. During his lifetime, Battist took out certain loans with the bank. As security for these loans, Battist pledged the account in question. Aurelia was unaware…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harms v. SpragueIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. The People v. VarelIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Menicocci v. ARCHER NAT'L BK. OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. David v. Ridgely-Farmers Safe Deposit Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. Harms v. SpragueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pescetto v. Colonial Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Baillie v. RaoulAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API