Legal Opinion

State v. LeFort

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 1, 1991No. 64538PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

The State of Kansas filed an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s order suppressing evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant. The district court found that the warrant was defective because it lacked sufficient particularity in describing the place to be searched. The Court of Appeals found that the warrant met the test of practical accuracy sufficient to identify the residence to be searched and reversed the district court. We accepted the defendant’s petition for review.

The estranged wife of James LeFort told…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. State v. DeskinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. State v. RupnickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API