Sig M. Glukstad, Inc. v. Lineas Aereas Nacional-Chile
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Sig M. Glukstad, Inc. appeals the district court’s dismissal of its complaint for failure to comply with a discovery order to reveal the identity of its undisclosed principal. Because we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in choosing the extreme sanction of dismissal, we affirm.
Glukstad is a freight forwarder in Miami, Florida. For several years Glukstad has forwarded watches arriving from Hong Kong to various foreign countries for an undisclosed principal. Glukstad does not have any financial interest in the cargo forwarded, but acts strictly as a freight forwarder.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grace K. Emerick and James L. Emerick, Sr. v. Fenick Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Johnny Segona, D/B/A Highway 190 Truck Stop and as Truckem Up ParadiseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Bruce Grant Bonaventure, Custodian and Guardian for Minor Children, Grant Bonaventure, II and Lynne Bonaventure v. C. Victor ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reginald R. Brinkmann, Jr. v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff AbnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Adolph Coors Company v. Movement Against Racism and the KlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Rose Kabbe v. Rotan Mosle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Sig M. Glukstad, Inc. v. Lineas Aereas Nacional-ChileCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981