Legal Opinion

Domanski v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1987No. Nos. 755-83,067-84PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING ON COURT’S OWN MOTIONS

2Per curiam

In our original opinion in West v. State, 702 S.W.2d 629 (Tex.Cr.App.1986) we rejected appellant’s argument that the State’s petition for discretionary review had been untimely filed, and proceeded to the merits of the State’s petition. Ulti*719mately we reversed the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstated the judgment of conviction in the trial court.

Subsequently, in Domanski v. State, 725 S.W.2d 717 (Tex.Cr.App.1986), in virtually identical circumstances, we upheld the State’s contention that appellant’s petition for discretionary…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Domanski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  2. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  3. Fielder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Hector Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. Hector Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API