Legal Opinion

In re Curtin

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

This motion is denied. Petitioner has no interest

in the property in question, but is the owner of adjoining property. Respondent Deegan, as tenement house commissioner, may not raise such an issue. It can be raised only by those asserting right of possession or title therein. All such agree that respondent Spallone-Ciampi Corporation is the owner and had the right to file the plans in question. Under the circumstances the application and plans were properly and seasonably filed. This is the main ground of reliance of petitioner for the relief sought herein. It is asserted in addition that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lakes Island Realty Co. v. McDermottNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hurwitz v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleming v. FoleyNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API