Legal Opinion

Hawkins Ex Rel. Hawkins v. Peart

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2001No. 20000562PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

T1 Defendant Navajo Trails required plaintiff Jessica Hawking's mother to sign a release form prior to allowing Hawkins to ride one of its horses. The release form contained a waiver of liability and an indemnity provision. The district court invalidated the waiver provision on public policy grounds, but upheld the indemnity provision. Hawkins appeals the district court's decision upholding the indemnity clause, and Navajo Trails cross-appeals the court's invalidation of the waiver provision. We conclude that both the waiver provision and the indemnity provision are invalid.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Dalury v. S-K-I, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Wagenblast v. Odessa School District No. 105-157-166JWashington Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. HOJNOWSKI EX REL. HOJNOWSKI v. Vans Skate ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. Global Travel Marketing, Inc. v. SheaSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. Milne v. USA Cycling Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2013

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API