Legal Opinion
State v. Floyd
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 2009No. 08-KA-746PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADELINE JASMINE, Judge Pro Tempore.
|2The defendant, Cleon C. Floyd, Jr., has appealed his conviction of possession of cocaine, in violation of R.S. 40:967. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This matter has a complicated and unusual procedural history. Most notably, the defendant has pled guilty to the crime charged, reserving only certain issues, as will be discussed below. He now appears before this Court on his second appeal.
On November 20, 2002, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney charged the defendant with possession of cocaine, in vio*684lation of LSA-R.S. 40:967.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ErvinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. LawrenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State v. LawrenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State v. LawrenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State v. LawrenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019