State v. Whaley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Justice.
The sole issue before us is whether the Court of Appeals erred when it concluded the trial court properly excluded certain testimony and evidence during cross-examination intended to call into question the credibility of the victim. We reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On 19 December 2003, a criminal summons was issued charging defendant, Jane Brock Whaley, with committing simple assault in violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-33(a) in Rutherford County on 24 February 2002. As set out in the criminal summons, the Magistrate found probable cause to believe that defendant “did…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. Al-BayyinahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. StittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Weaver Investment Co. v. Pressly Development AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.