Legal Opinion

State v. Whaley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 25, 2008No. 440PA06PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

The sole issue before us is whether the Court of Appeals erred when it concluded the trial court properly excluded certain testimony and evidence during cross-examination intended to call into question the credibility of the victim. We reverse.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On 19 December 2003, a criminal summons was issued charging defendant, Jane Brock Whaley, with committing simple assault in violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-33(a) in Rutherford County on 24 February 2002. As set out in the criminal summons, the Magistrate found probable cause to believe that defendant “did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. Al-BayyinahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  3. State v. StittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Weaver Investment Co. v. Pressly Development AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API