Brainin v. Rudd
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LUONGO, District Judge.
This is the motion of defendant Melikian to vacate a default judgment in this diversity action on the ground that the matter in controversy does not involve the requisite jurisdictional amount.1 The suit is against two individual endorsers of a $10,000 note issued by Rudd-Melikian, Inc., payable ten months after date with interest at the rate of 8% per annum. Between the date of issuance of the note and the date of its maturity, and before any payment had been made thereon, the corporation filed bankruptcy proceedings, causing plaintiff to accelerate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edwards v. Bates CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Brown v. WebsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- John Regan, Administrator v. Donald Marshall, D/B/A Marshall's Mobilgas StationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Irving Brainin v. K. Cyrus MelikianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Irving Brainin v. K. Cyrus MelikianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Irving Brainin v. K. Cyrus MelikianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968