Legal Opinion

Romans v. Orange Pelican, LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 10, 2022No. 1:22-cv-04169Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION FRANK ROMANS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) N o. 22-cv-4169 v. ) ) Judge Marvin E. Aspen ORANGE PELICAN, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge: After filing this lawsuit against Defendant Orange Pelican, LLC (“Orange Pelican”), Plaintiff Frank Romans now moves for prejudgment attachment of Orange Pelican’s assets. (Motion for Pre-Judgment Attachment Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64 (“Attachment Motion”) (Dkt. No. 6).)1 Orange Pelican, in turn, moves to dismiss Romans’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API