Legal Opinion

Justh v. National Bank of Commonwealth

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided June 15, 1873Published

Appeal by plaintiffs from judgment dismissing the complaint. .

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Freedman, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover the sum of $40,000, loaned by *493them to William E. Gray & Co., and deposited by the latter with defendant, on the ground that the loan was made on the security of certain collaterals, which proved to be forged. On the trial the following facts were established.

William E. Gray & Go. kept an account with defendant, and, on the morning of December 10th, 1869, they commenced the business of the day by borrowing $30,000 from said bank. The loan was made in the ordinary manner of doing business with brokers, on call, upon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. &198tna National Bank v. . Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Everett v. SaltusNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Decker v. . MathewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. Edwards v.Farmers' Fire Insurance & Loan Co.New York Supreme Court · 1839
  5. Trustees of the First Baptist Church v. Brooklyn Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API