Legal Opinion

Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. John

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided February 20, 1922No. 1585Published

Rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defence. C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1921, No. 1585.

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, J.,

This case is before us upon a rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defence. The rule was heard upon the original affidavit; but, after argument, defendants’ counsel asked leave to file a supplemental affidavit, and this we have permitted. As hereafter stated, we have considered these affidavits as one.

*318The action is assumpsit brought by plaintiff to recover damages for breach of contracts to purchase certain sugar. There were three contracts, similar in character, each calling for one carload of 115 barrels of sugar, or “equivalent,” at 22i cents per pound; one for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Fulton Farmers Ass'n v. BombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Woldert Grocery Co. v. WilkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API