Legal Opinion
Pincus Hueter v. Kruse
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 20, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-3686Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVEN JAY PINCUS HUETER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:20-cv-03686 (TNM) LEALAIALOA FRITZ MICHAEL KRUSE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, proceeding pro se, sues over 70 defendants, including federal and American Samoa government officials. See Third Am. Compl. at 11–20, ECF No. 104. 1 He mainly challenges government actions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. See generally id. Before the Court is Hueter’s request to file a Fourth Amended Complaint. See Pl.’s Mot. for Leave to File Fourth Am. Compl.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- The Honorable Bob Barr v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.