In the Interest of J. H.

Mikell, Judge.

J. H.’s mother appeals the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Because clear and convincing evidence was not presented to show that J. H.’s *212continued legal relationship with her mother was likely to harm thé child, we reverse. We emphasize that our decision relates only to the continuation of a legal relationship between mother and child and is not intended to suggest that J. H. should be returned to her mother’s custody. The evidence shows that placing the child in the custody of her mother would be likely to harm…