Legal Opinion

New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1931No. 19998PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an action brought by defendants in error, herein referred to as plaintiffs, against plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages. The action is one in the nature of slander of title for an oil and gas lease based upon the filing of an affidavit in the office of the county clerk, and causing the same to be recorded, which was in the nature of a notice to the public that defendant claimed an oil and gas lease on the same premises, prior and superior to that of plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs allege that on April 21, 1923, they purchased from O. M. and Leean…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Garfield Oil Co. v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Eastern Oil Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Cohn v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Ward v. Mid-West & Gulf Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Frankfort Oil Company, a Division of Carstairs Bros. Distilling Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation v. W. F. SnakardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Warren v. Bank of MarionDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1985
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. Ellison v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API