Legal Opinion

People v. Campbell

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

OuRTioRARi issued out of the Supreme Court and attested on tlie 24th clay of March, 1894, directed to Eranlc Campbell, as late Comptroller of tlie State of New York, and James A. [Roberts, as Comptroller of the State of New York, commanding them to certify and return to tlie office of the clerk of the county of Albany all tlieir acts and proceedings relative to the revision and readjustment of the amount of taxes of the New York Central and Hudson [River ’Railroad Company.

1Opinion of the Court

PüTNAM, J.:

The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, for the years 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888, 1889, 1890 and 1891, made tbe annual report required by chapter 542, Laws of 1880, and tli.e several acts amendatory and supplementary thereto, and paid the tax required by said statute-on its franchise or business. It will be seen by an examination of its reports contained in the case, on which the annual franchise tax was computed, that it failed to state in either the amount of its capital stock employed within the State, as required by section 11 of chapter 542 of the Laws of 3 880…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. People Ex Rel. Edison Electric Light Co. v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Jackson ex dem. Kenyon v. VirgilNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  4. People Ex Rel. John A. Roebling's Sons' Co. v. WempleNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Pratt v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fircrest Supply, Inc. v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API