Legal Opinion

People v. Bigelow

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1998No. Docket 188900PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to MCR 7.215(H)(3), this conflict panel was convened to resolve an inconsistency between this Court’s prior, vacated opinion in People v Bigelow, 225 Mich App 806; 571 NW2d 520 (1997), and this Court’s earlier decision in People v Passeno, 195 Mich App 91; 489 NW2d 152 (1992). In accordance with MCR 7.215(H)(1), the prior Bigelow panel was required to follow the precedent of Passeno, supra. Were it not for MCR 7.215(H)(1), the previous panel would have reversed the decision of the lower court.

The conflict at issue involves defendant’s convictions of first-degree premeditated murder,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PassenoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. GimottyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. ZeitlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. BigelowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Christopher Allan OrosMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. People v. ClineMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. FordMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. LongMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API