Legal Opinion

People v. Woodall

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1978No. Docket 77-2526PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

United Bonding Company appeals as of right from an order of the Detroit Recorder’s Court entering a judgment of forfeiture on a surety bond in the amount of $500.

Although the default occurred on December 8, 1969, the bond was not forfeited. On March 8, 1977, a nunc pro tunc order was entered forfeiting the bond as of December 8, 1969. We find that the entry of this order was improper.

The function of such an order is to supply an omission in the record of action previously taken by the court but not properly recorded; an order nunc pro tunc may not be utilized to supply a previously omitted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Tom JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Sleboede v. SleboedeMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. BirminghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McClintonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. In Re Bail Bond ForfeitureMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. American Bankers InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API