Legal Opinion

State v. Oram

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 2, 2011No. 104,163PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Misty Oram appeals her conviction for possession of marijuana after a bench trial was held on stipulated facts. On appeal, Oram raises two arguments. First, Oram argues that the trial court correctly concluded that the search violated Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 173 L. Ed. 2d 485 (2009), but she *902argues that the trial court erred when it determined that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applied. We determine that the trial court correctly held that the search violated Gant. Nevertheless, we determine that because the search was not conducted in an…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lamont Wilford v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. PettaySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Banks v. OpatDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
  5. State v. GillilandCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API