Brockman, M.D v. Friedman
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES T. BROCKMAN, M.D., Case No.: 23-CV-0162-GPC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 14 STANLEY FRIEDMAN, individually; (2) AWARDING DEFENDANT and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 COSTS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(d) Defendants. 16 [ECF No. 10] 17 18 Before the Court is Defendant Stanley Friedman’s Motion for Sanctions against 19 Plaintiff James T. Brockman and Plaintiff’s Counsel. ECF No. 10. Brockman filed a 20 response in opposition, ECF No. 12, and Friedman filed a reply, ECF No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Geraldine Marie Blodgett, in Re Hector C. Perez, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.